Shell marketing consultant quits, accusing firm of ‘extreme harms’ to surroundings | Shell

A senior safety consultant has stop working with Shell after 11 years, accusing the fossil gas producer in a bombshell public video of causing “excessive harms” to the setting.

Caroline Dennett claimed Shell had a “disregard for climate change risks” and urged others within the oil and gas industry to “stroll away while there’s nonetheless time”.

The manager, who works for the impartial company Clout, ended her working relationship with Shell in an open letter to its executives and 1,400 employees. In an accompanying video, posted on LinkedIn, she said she had stop due to Shell’s “double-talk on climate”.

Dennett accused the oil and gas agency of “working past the design limits of our planetary methods” and “not putting environmental security before manufacturing”.

She mentioned: “Shell’s acknowledged safety ambition is to ‘do no harm’ – ‘Aim Zero’, they call it – and it sounds honourable but they're utterly failing on it.

“They know that continued oil and gas extraction causes extreme harms, to our climate, to our environment and to folks. And whatever they are saying, Shell is solely not winding down on fossil fuels.”

Dennett instructed the Guardian she “couldn't marry these conflicts with my conscience”, adding: “I could not carry that any longer, and I’m able to cope with the results.”

Shell was a “main client” of Dennett’s enterprise, which specialises in evaluating safety procedures in high-risk industries including oil and gasoline production. She started working with Shell within the aftermath of BP’s Deepwater Horizon oil spill in 2010, which rocked the business.

“I can not work for a corporation that ignores all of the alarms and dismisses the dangers of climate change and ecological collapse,” she stated. “Because, contrary to Shell’s public expressions round web zero, they don't seem to be winding down on oil and gasoline, however planning to explore and extract much more.”

Dennett – a felony justice graduate who has spent her career in analysis and consultancy – was inspired to stop working with Shell after watching information footage of Extinction Insurrection climate protesters urging the corporate’s staff to go away. The movement’s TruthTeller whistleblowing challenge encourages oil and fuel staff to stroll away from the trade.

The marketing consultant, who runs internal security surveys and is predicated in Weymouth, Dorset, acknowledged she was “privileged” to have the ability to stroll away and “many people working in fossil fuel corporations just aren’t so fortunate”.

She urged Shell’s executives to “look within the mirror and ask themselves in the event that they actually consider their vision for extra oil and gas extraction secures a protected future for humanity”.

In late 2020, a number of Shell executives in its clean power sector left amid experiences they were pissed off on the pace of Shell’s shift in direction of greener fuels.

Her announcement comes on the eve of Shell’s AGM in London on Tuesday. Its plans to cut back emissions will likely be mentioned at the assembly where the Dutch activist group Comply with It will push for the corporate’s policies to be more according to the Paris local weather accord. Shell’s board has informed traders to reject the group’s decision that asks it to set more stringent climate objectives.

The Shell investor Royal London has said it intends to abstain on a vote on the agency’s climate transition proposals.

The Shell chief govt, Ben van Beurden, might experience an investor riot towards his £13.5m pay packet on the AGM after the investment adviser Pirc urged a vote towards it.

Signal as much as the each day Business Right this moment email or observe Guardian Enterprise on Twitter at @BusinessDesk

A Shell spokesperson said: “Be in little question, we are decided to ship on our global strategy to be a web zero company by 2050 and thousands of our individuals are working hard to attain this. We've got set targets for the quick, medium and long term, and have every intention of hitting them.

“We’re already investing billions of dollars in low-carbon energy, although the world will nonetheless need oil and gas for decades to come in sectors that may’t be simply decarbonised.”

Shell additionally faces the prospect of a possible windfall tax to fund cuts to household payments after the power business reported bumper earnings fuelled by the rise in market prices, prompting opposition events to call on the federal government to bring in a one-off levy.

On Monday, the largest oil and gas producer in the North Sea spoke out in opposition to a one-off levy, arguing it would lead to the trade approving fewer tasks.

Harbour Vitality’s chief executive, Linda Cook dinner, informed the Financial Times: “The next tax burden will make it tougher for brand new oil and fuel initiatives to fulfill investment hurdle charges, that means fewer projects can be sanctioned.

“That is at a time when industry is being inspired to increase domestic UK oil and gas production and support an orderly power transition.”

Harbour has advised the federal government it plans to speculate $6bn in the North Sea over three years as business makes its case in opposition to the tax. The Guardian revealed this month that Cook dinner had received a £4.6m “golden hey” from the firm.