Supreme Court docket says leaked abortion draft is authentic; Roberts orders investigation into leak

Pro-abortion and anti-abortion demonstrators protest exterior the U.S. Supreme Court after the leak of a draft majority opinion written by Justice Samuel Alito preparing for a majority of the court to overturn the landmark Roe v. Wade abortion rights resolution later this 12 months, in Washington, U.S., Could 3, 2022. 

Evelyn Hockstein | Reuters

Supreme Court docket Chief Justice John Roberts on Tuesday confirmed the authenticity of a leaked draft courtroom opinion that might toss out longstanding abortion rights, however famous that isn't the court's closing resolution.

Roberts ordered an investigation into the leaker.

"To the extent this betrayal of the confidences of the Courtroom was intended to undermine the integrity of our operations, it will not succeed," the chief justice said in a statement. "The work of the Courtroom won't be affected in any approach."

"I've directed the Marshal of the Courtroom to launch an investigation into the source of the leak," Roberts mentioned.

The advance publication of a draft opinion is virtually unprecedented for the excessive courtroom, the place leaks of any kind are exceedingly rare.

The court shares drafts of opinions internally lengthy before they are issued publicly, Roberts noted, calling it "a routine and essential part of the Courtroom's confidential deliberative work."

The draft on this high-profile abortion case was created in February, in line with Politico, which obtained the opinion.

The justices, law clerks and other workers of the courtroom are "intensely loyal to the institution and devoted to the rule of regulation," Roberts mentioned.

"Court docket employees have an exemplary and important custom of respecting the confidentiality of the judicial process and upholding the trust of the Court. This was a singular and egregious breach of that trust that is an affront to the Court docket and the neighborhood of public servants who work right here," he stated.

The publication of the draft opinion rocked Washington, triggering waves of shock and fury from Democrats who are actually pushing for Congress to instantly codify abortion rights by way of laws.

Republicans decried the leak itself, and plenty of known as for the kind of investigation the Roberts introduced late Tuesday morning. The GOP lawmakers who commented on the draft opinion praised it for placing decisions about abortion in the arms of states as a substitute of the federal government.

The 98-page draft opinion was penned by Justice Samuel Alito, certainly one of six conservatives on a court docket that has moved sharply to the appropriate in the wake of the Trump administration.

Alito's draft would toss out the precedent set by the 1973 case Roe v. Wade and reaffirmed in 1992 by Planned Parenthood v. Casey. These pivotal rulings shield the correct to get an abortion before the purpose of fetal viability and require that regulations limiting abortion entry do not pose an "undue burden."

Alito wrote: "We maintain that Roe and Casey should be overruled."

The draft of the opinion of the court in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Group would side with the state of Mississippi in protection of a law that may ban virtually all abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy.

Lower federal courts had blocked the regulation on the grounds that it violates the protections established by the Roe and Casey selections.

This is breaking information. Please examine again for updates.