Former Idaho lawmaker found guilty of raping intern
Warning: Undefined variable $post_id in /home/webpages/lima-city/booktips/wordpress_de-2022-03-17-33f52d/wp-content/themes/fast-press/single.php on line 26

BOISE, Idaho (AP) — A former Idaho lawmaker was convicted Friday of raping a 19-year-old legislative intern after a dramatic trial by which the younger woman fled the witness stand throughout testimony, saying “I can’t do that.”
The intern instructed a Statehouse supervisor that Aaron von Ehlinger raped her at his house after the 2 had dinner at a Boise restaurant in March 2021. Von Ehlinger said the sex was consensual.
At the time, the Lewiston Republican was serving as a state consultant, however he later resigned.
Von Ehlinger, 39, was found responsible Friday of rape. He was found not guilty of sexual penetration with a foreign object.
Von Ehlinger sat calmly as the decision was learn, as he has throughout the trial.
Afterward, 4th District Choose Michael Reardon advised the jury: “This has been an uncommon case attended by many surprising circumstances, but I recognize your consideration ... and arduous work.”
A felony rape conviction carries a minimal sentence of 1 12 months in prison in Idaho. The utmost penalty might be as high as life in jail, on the judge’s discretion. Sentencing has been scheduled for July 28.
As von Ehlinger was remanded into custody and handcuffed, he talked quietly with his legal professional who removed objects from von Ehlinger’s pockets.
The prosecution remained stoic as they left the courtroom, but as soon as they reached a lower floor they stopped to briefly to congratulate each other on the verdict.
Von Ehlinger’s lawyer, Jon Cox, could not be immediately reached for comment after the trial.
The Related Press typically doesn't identify people who say they have been sexually assaulted, and has referred to the girl in this case as “Jane Doe” at her request.
In a press convention, Ada County Prosecuting Attorney Jan Bennetts thanked the jury, investigators and the prosecutors who handled the case.
“Final however not least, it took an unbelievable amount of courage for the victim in this case, Jane Doe, to come back ahead,” Bennetts mentioned. “I wish to acknowledge the braveness that she took in coming ahead.”
Doe testified on the second day of the trial. She haltingly described the moments the alleged assault started, earlier than abruptly leaving the witness stand.
“He tried to place his fingers between my legs and I closed my knees,” Doe stated.
At that, she stood up.
“I can’t do that,” she said, shortly walking out of the courtroom.
The decide gave the prosecuting attorneys 10 minutes to seek out her to find out if she would return and resume her testimony.
When she didn't, the choose instructed the jurors they needed to “strike (Doe’s testimony) out of your minds as if it never happened,” because the protection couldn't cross-examine her.
During the press convention, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Katelyn Farley said the moment Doe left the trial was “heart-wrenching,” however said she and deputy prosecutor Whitney Welsh had ready for trial realizing that Doe might not be capable of testify.
“I believe it’s necessary that she decided to stroll within the room, and she or he also determined to stroll out — those were her selections,” Welsh said.
Throughout his testimony Thursday, von Ehlinger typically spoke in a transparent, loud voice on to jurors, saying he and Doe decided to return to his apartment to “hang out” after consuming at a elaborate Boise restaurant. Then they started making out on the couch, he mentioned.
“Issues were going effectively, and I asked (Doe) if she wish to transfer to the bed room,” von Ehlinger mentioned. “She said ‘Positive.’ We got up, held arms and walked into the bed room.”
Deliberations stretched for seven hours till almost 8 p.m. Thursday before the jury decided to interrupt for the night. At one level, the choose summoned the attorneys to his chambers as a result of the jury requested a query. No particulars were made public concerning the jury’s inquiry.
When the allegations became public — largely because of the legislative ethics investigation — Doe confronted unrelenting harassment from some of von Ehlinger’s supporters. Her title, photo and private particulars about her life have been repeatedly publicized in “doxxing” incidents. One of many people who incessantly harassed her was in the courthouse to attend the trial, but regulation enforcement banned the person from the floor the place the case was being heard.
Throughout closing arguments, Farley told jurors that the case was about “power in the wrong arms” used to the “nice devastation” of Doe. Von Ehlinger had social, political and bodily power over the petite intern, Farley said.
“He used that energy to rape and forcibly penetrate her,” Farley stated, pointing at von Ehlinger. Doe resisted in several ways, she mentioned, highlighting the testimony of legislation enforcement investigators and a nurse sexual assault examiner who interviewed Doe after the alleged assault.
“Words present lack of consent. Excuses of ‘Why this shouldn’t occur’ show lack of consent. Yanking your head again and getting an damage reveals lack of consent,” Farley said.
But von Ehlinger’s lawyer advised jurors the prosecution’s case was made up of “purple herrings,” and stated von Ehlinger was a reputable person who willingly took the stand to share his facet of the story.
The investigators and the nurse who carried out the sexual assault examination testified earlier this week. They said Doe reported being pinned down whereas von Ehlinger compelled her to perform oral intercourse, and that she knew he frequently carried a handgun and had positioned it on a dresser near the bed at the time of the assault. The nurse also testified that Doe had a “goose egg” on the again of her head from placing the wall or a headboard while trying to jerk her head away from von Ehlinger’s grip.